Incoming Labor Data Sets the Tone for the Year 2023

Incoming Labor Data Sets the Tone for the Year 2023

January 04, 2023
Share |

Print / Read as PDF

The end of a calendar year should have little influence on the directional move of markets, yet tax considerations and general emotional motivations often exaggerate moves at the turn of the year. Several key economic events over the next few weeks will set the tone for incoming data and interest rate policy in 2023. Below are a few that I am paying attention to and what I believe could be thought of them:

  • November JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) being announced 1/4. It is important as JOLTS remains one of the most important indicators of labor market tightness to the Fed. Some measures have begun showing active listings have dropped sharply in the last two months. 
  • FOMC minutes will also come out on 1/4. This is the written commentary from Powell and the Fed. It will give more exact info on the Fed's high PCE projections.
  • Nonfarm Payrolls will be released on 1/6. This is where the potential overstatement in the last Philly Fed survey. We are looking for continued deceleration in net jobs added.
  • Other Labor Stats were also released on 1/6. This will give more clarity on the unemployment rate, hourly earnings, and labor force participation. 
  • December CPI will be released on 1/12. This is probably the most important December number. If it comes in soft this will support 3 consecutive prints of easing inflation at the consumer level. 

All of these tend to be a reflection of labor. I am focused on this as this is what Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has said he is focused on. Labor tends to be a lagging indicator, but if this is what he has adamantly focused on, then this is one of the important components we should remain focused on.

Other than economic indicators, we are also noticing these important issues which are indicators of a world slowdown in the offing:

  • China has shown three months of economic contraction
  • German CPI has been declining at the quickest rate since 2015
  • Natural gas prices are now at February 2022 lows

Additionally, investor sentiment (attitudes) measures of market participants amongst other readings should be considered. The rolling 51-week average of bullish sentiment hit an all-time low, even lower than the Tech Wreck of 00-03 and the Great Financial Crisis of 08-09. This study has been running for 30+ years, and this is the most entrenched and persistent level of bearish sentiment in the survey's history going back to 1987. Periods as negative as this have tended to correspond to secular lows in stock. I keep asking, are things this bad in the US economy? 

In terms of greater conviction, our analysis indicates the 2022 bear cycle could be exhausting itself. The chart above clearly demonstrates this. However, if the S&P remains in its downtrend below its 200-day average, my outlook faces the lingering risk that the bear market has not finished. This dampens my near-term expectations against my view that opportunity has been presented.

Looking ahead, the October low at 3,500 is significant, it’ll be more important that internal breadth does not re-broaden on any subsequent market drops. If nothing changes, nothing changes! If the market continues its decline, longer-term interest rates do not decline, and the Fed does nothing to switch its aggressive stance, then the markets could remain difficult. With these points being known, a change in something structural is needed. 

 3 key points reinforce my 2023 outlook: 

  • Market-cycle indicators have reset to oversold
  • Historical probabilities favor a bullish reversal
  • Many macro concerns appear overstated—except the index’s downtrend

In terms of potential upside, the average gain during the first 15 months (Oct. 2022-Dec. 2023) coming out of a non-recessionary bear market (1962, 1966, 1978, 1987, 2016, 2018) has been 25% in the post-war era.

It should be noted that this bear market has not been in full swing during a recession. Therefore, in looking at history, the recovery could be sharp and quite large. Assuming October marked the final 18-month low of the 2022 bear cycle, this is the basis for a December 2023 gain from current levels.

Additionally, we’ve found that the best one-rule definition of a cycle bottom is an 18-month low because, unlike a 20% decline, it considers time spent moving sideways. Most publicized measures use the amount of the decline vs. the period that the market has been in a decline. Time tends to be a more accurate measure when examining recoveries. The arrows below are the declines where there has been no recession present. This could be an important distinction.

The last point I’ll make in this week’s note comes from Ari Wald's Bear Market Checklist. According to him, the textbook criteria for a market bottom developed in October, and, if true, this can be an opportunity for the long-term investor. We won’t know for sure until well after the fact, but many measures support that October could be important. While this places the current cycle at a crossroads, I want to make sure that I am being clear the emphasis is on October’s long-term opportunity, and concurrently think additional basing is still exhibiting itself.

Historical probabilities favor a bullish reversal based on the above-mentioned points as well as the checklist above. The S&P 500 fell 28% peak-to-trough over nine months in 2022, ending in October. This may not seem like a tremendous amount as there have been devastating declines before that have been double this. But this is why I stressed above that there is no recession present in this pullback. Most major declines are associated with a negative structural issue. That is not the case “this time.”

In the post-war era, we’ve found 16 out of 20 bear cycles (80%) were either limited to a 30% drop or lasted less than a year—many of these also only retraced 50% or less of the prior advance. This is why I believe historical probabilities favor a bullish reversal. We’ve only counted four declines that were both long and deep: 1968, 1973, 2000, 2007. Credit conditions are stronger now than they were in those outlier periods, and macro concerns appear overstated too.

In closing, although the market's action last week was far from positive, statistically, we are at severe extremes and often directions change before the reasons for the decline change. The markets tend to be a discounting mechanism and economic slowdown and unemployment rates seem to be the initial measures needed before a structural and overt change by the Fed. 

Please feel free to call or write in should you have any questions. We are always available for you! Happy New Year!

.

.

.

.

.

Get Ken's Weekly Market Commentary Delivered In Your Inbox!

Click Here to Subscribe

-

-

-

-

Important Disclosures: 

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial professional prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. 

Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal.

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average is comprised of 30 stocks that are major factors in their industries and widely held by individuals and institutional investors.

The Nasdaq-100 is a large-cap growth index. It includes 100 of the largest domestic and international non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market based on market capitalization.

The Russell 2000 Index is an unmanaged index generally representative of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 index, which represents approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index.

This information is not intended to be a substitute for specific individualized tax advice. We suggest that you discuss your specific tax issues with a qualified tax advisor.